TY  - JOUR
AU  - Perišić, Vladimir
AU  - Perišić, Vesna
AU  - Luković, Kristina
AU  - Bratković, Kamenko
AU  - Zečević, Veselinka
AU  - Babić, Snežana
AU  - Matković Stojšin, Mirela
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://intam.institut-tamis.rs/handle/123456789/227
AB  - Hlebna pšenica je jedna od najzastupljenijih ratarskih vrsta, čiji je nivo i stabilnost prinosa veoma važan za prehrambenu sigurnost Republike Srbije. U radu je ispitivana stabilnost ekspresije prinosa zrna 15 genotipova ozime hlebne pšenice u različitim agroekološkim uslovima Srbije, korišćenjem AMMI modela i GGE-biplot analize. Cilj je bio da se utvrdi koja od primenjenih analiza je superiornija u identifikaciji najpoželjnijih genotipova za gajenje u datim sredinama. Analiza varijanse je pokazala da genotip i interakcija genotip-sredina (G×E) predstavljaju veoma značajan izvor varijabilnosti pri ekspresiji prinosa zrna. AMMI i GGE analize su dale slične rezultate, pa je nesporan zaključak da je neophodno višelokacijske oglede, pored analizom varijanse koja se najćešće rutinski koristi, analizirati i jednim od ova dva modela, koji kombinuju analizu varijanse i PCA analizu. AMMI analiza je jednostavnija za interpretaciju i bliža je agronomskom konceptu poimanja ogleda, dok je GGE analiza kompleksnija i jasnija za interpretaciju gde ko pobeđuje, odnosno za definisanje usko prilagođenih genotipova datim sredinama. Tako G11, kao genotip sa najvećim prosečnim prinosom je usko prilagođen lokaciji Sombor, pa se prevashodno može preporučiti toj lokaciji ali i lokaciji 2 (Kruševac), dok se genotipovi skromnijih zahteva (G2) pre mogu preporučiti za gajenje u lokaciji 1 (Kragujevac), koja se odlikuje lošijim zemljištem i manjom količinom i lošijim rasporedom padavina.
AB  - Bread wheat is one of the most represented field crops whose level and stability of yield is very important for the food security in Republic Serbia. In the paper was investigated stability of yield expression of 15 winter bread wheat genotypes in different agroecological conditions of Serbia, using the Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model and GGE-biplot method of analysis. Aim of investigation was to determine which of applied analysis is superior in identification of the most desirable genotypes for cultivation in given environments. Analysis of variance showed that genotype and genotype-environment (G×E) interaction represent highly significant sources of variability in expression of grain yield. AMMI and GGE analyses were point out similar results and an indisputable conclusion is that multienvironment trials, besides routine usage of analysis of variance, must be analized with one of this two models, which combine analysis of variance and PCA analysis. AMMI analysis is simpler for interpretation and closer to the concept of view of the agronomical trial, while GGE analysis is more complex and gives more precise interpretation of "which-won-where", i .e. for defining of narrowly adapted genotypes in given environments. Thus, G11 as the genotype with highest average yield is narrow adapted to the environment Sombor and can be recommended, as well as in the environment 2 (Kruševac), while genotypes with modest requests (G2) rather can be recommended for cultivation in the environment 1 (Kragujevac), which is characterized by less fertile soil and a smaller amount and uneven distribution of precipitation.
PB  - Društvo selekcionara i semenara Republike Srbije, Beograd
T2  - Selekcija i semenarstvo
T1  - Stabilnost prinosa zrna genotipova ozime pšenice
T1  - Stability of grain yield performance of winter wheat genotypes
EP  - 60
IS  - 2
SP  - 52
VL  - 28
DO  - 10.5937/SelSem2201052P
UR  - conv_73
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Perišić, Vladimir and Perišić, Vesna and Luković, Kristina and Bratković, Kamenko and Zečević, Veselinka and Babić, Snežana and Matković Stojšin, Mirela",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Hlebna pšenica je jedna od najzastupljenijih ratarskih vrsta, čiji je nivo i stabilnost prinosa veoma važan za prehrambenu sigurnost Republike Srbije. U radu je ispitivana stabilnost ekspresije prinosa zrna 15 genotipova ozime hlebne pšenice u različitim agroekološkim uslovima Srbije, korišćenjem AMMI modela i GGE-biplot analize. Cilj je bio da se utvrdi koja od primenjenih analiza je superiornija u identifikaciji najpoželjnijih genotipova za gajenje u datim sredinama. Analiza varijanse je pokazala da genotip i interakcija genotip-sredina (G×E) predstavljaju veoma značajan izvor varijabilnosti pri ekspresiji prinosa zrna. AMMI i GGE analize su dale slične rezultate, pa je nesporan zaključak da je neophodno višelokacijske oglede, pored analizom varijanse koja se najćešće rutinski koristi, analizirati i jednim od ova dva modela, koji kombinuju analizu varijanse i PCA analizu. AMMI analiza je jednostavnija za interpretaciju i bliža je agronomskom konceptu poimanja ogleda, dok je GGE analiza kompleksnija i jasnija za interpretaciju gde ko pobeđuje, odnosno za definisanje usko prilagođenih genotipova datim sredinama. Tako G11, kao genotip sa najvećim prosečnim prinosom je usko prilagođen lokaciji Sombor, pa se prevashodno može preporučiti toj lokaciji ali i lokaciji 2 (Kruševac), dok se genotipovi skromnijih zahteva (G2) pre mogu preporučiti za gajenje u lokaciji 1 (Kragujevac), koja se odlikuje lošijim zemljištem i manjom količinom i lošijim rasporedom padavina., Bread wheat is one of the most represented field crops whose level and stability of yield is very important for the food security in Republic Serbia. In the paper was investigated stability of yield expression of 15 winter bread wheat genotypes in different agroecological conditions of Serbia, using the Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model and GGE-biplot method of analysis. Aim of investigation was to determine which of applied analysis is superior in identification of the most desirable genotypes for cultivation in given environments. Analysis of variance showed that genotype and genotype-environment (G×E) interaction represent highly significant sources of variability in expression of grain yield. AMMI and GGE analyses were point out similar results and an indisputable conclusion is that multienvironment trials, besides routine usage of analysis of variance, must be analized with one of this two models, which combine analysis of variance and PCA analysis. AMMI analysis is simpler for interpretation and closer to the concept of view of the agronomical trial, while GGE analysis is more complex and gives more precise interpretation of "which-won-where", i .e. for defining of narrowly adapted genotypes in given environments. Thus, G11 as the genotype with highest average yield is narrow adapted to the environment Sombor and can be recommended, as well as in the environment 2 (Kruševac), while genotypes with modest requests (G2) rather can be recommended for cultivation in the environment 1 (Kragujevac), which is characterized by less fertile soil and a smaller amount and uneven distribution of precipitation.",
publisher = "Društvo selekcionara i semenara Republike Srbije, Beograd",
journal = "Selekcija i semenarstvo",
title = "Stabilnost prinosa zrna genotipova ozime pšenice, Stability of grain yield performance of winter wheat genotypes",
pages = "60-52",
number = "2",
volume = "28",
doi = "10.5937/SelSem2201052P",
url = "conv_73"
}

Perišić, V., Perišić, V., Luković, K., Bratković, K., Zečević, V., Babić, S.,& Matković Stojšin, M.. (2022). Stabilnost prinosa zrna genotipova ozime pšenice. in Selekcija i semenarstvo
Društvo selekcionara i semenara Republike Srbije, Beograd., 28(2), 52-60.
https://doi.org/10.5937/SelSem2201052P
conv_73

Perišić V, Perišić V, Luković K, Bratković K, Zečević V, Babić S, Matković Stojšin M. Stabilnost prinosa zrna genotipova ozime pšenice. in Selekcija i semenarstvo. 2022;28(2):52-60.
doi:10.5937/SelSem2201052P
conv_73 .

Perišić, Vladimir, Perišić, Vesna, Luković, Kristina, Bratković, Kamenko, Zečević, Veselinka, Babić, Snežana, Matković Stojšin, Mirela, "Stabilnost prinosa zrna genotipova ozime pšenice" in Selekcija i semenarstvo, 28, no. 2 (2022):52-60,
https://doi.org/10.5937/SelSem2201052P .,
conv_73 .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Krga, Ivan
AU  - Simić, Aleksandar
AU  - Dželetović, Željko
AU  - Babić, Snežana
AU  - Katanski, Snežana
AU  - Roljević Nikolić, Svetlana
AU  - Damnjanović, Jelena
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://intam.institut-tamis.rs/handle/123456789/212
AB  - In limited growing conditions, intercropped field peas and oats can represent a significant source of forage rich in protein. If applied correctly, factors such as nitrogen fertilizer, the mowing phase, and sowing norms can significantly increase the productivity of these mixtures. Field trials were conducted to examine their productivity under different nitrogen levels (0, 40, 80 kg ha(-1)), different sowing norms/mixtures (field peas: oats-100:15%; 100:30%), and two stages of growth (full flowering, full pod formation). Nitrogen fertilizer and different sowing norms had a significant effect on the biomass, hay, and crude protein yields. On average, the highest hay yields were achieved with 80 kg ha(-1) N (4.96 t ha(-1)), followed by 40 kg ha(-1) N (4.27 t ha(-1)). The highest protein yields were achieved with 40 kg ha(-1) N (CP-704.1 kg ha(-1)), followed by 80 kg ha(-1) N (CP-637.6 kg ha(-1)). Sowing norm 100:30% achieved higher hay yields: 100:30%-4.82 t ha(-1); 100:15%-4.44 t ha(-1), while 100:15% achieved higher crude protein yields: 100:15%-730.4 kg ha(-1); 100:30%-692.7 kg ha(-1) on average. The costs were not significantly increased with the nitrogen fertilizer, but the net profits were increased by as much as 163%, depending on the nitrogen level and the mixture. Nitrogen fertilizer also achieves higher economic efficiency for the mixture 100:15% compared to the 100:30% mixture. Mixtures of field peas and oats outperform single-grown crops and provide cost-effective feed for a short time. Using optimal seed ratios and nitrogen fertilizer can significantly increase the productivity and profitability of the feed with minimal impact on the overall production costs.
PB  - MDPI, Basel
T2  - Agriculture-Basel
T1  - Biomass and Protein Yields of Field Peas and Oats Intercrop Affected by Sowing Norms and Nitrogen Fertilizer at Two Different Stages of Growth
IS  - 9
VL  - 11
DO  - 10.3390/agriculture11090871
UR  - conv_173
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Krga, Ivan and Simić, Aleksandar and Dželetović, Željko and Babić, Snežana and Katanski, Snežana and Roljević Nikolić, Svetlana and Damnjanović, Jelena",
year = "2021",
abstract = "In limited growing conditions, intercropped field peas and oats can represent a significant source of forage rich in protein. If applied correctly, factors such as nitrogen fertilizer, the mowing phase, and sowing norms can significantly increase the productivity of these mixtures. Field trials were conducted to examine their productivity under different nitrogen levels (0, 40, 80 kg ha(-1)), different sowing norms/mixtures (field peas: oats-100:15%; 100:30%), and two stages of growth (full flowering, full pod formation). Nitrogen fertilizer and different sowing norms had a significant effect on the biomass, hay, and crude protein yields. On average, the highest hay yields were achieved with 80 kg ha(-1) N (4.96 t ha(-1)), followed by 40 kg ha(-1) N (4.27 t ha(-1)). The highest protein yields were achieved with 40 kg ha(-1) N (CP-704.1 kg ha(-1)), followed by 80 kg ha(-1) N (CP-637.6 kg ha(-1)). Sowing norm 100:30% achieved higher hay yields: 100:30%-4.82 t ha(-1); 100:15%-4.44 t ha(-1), while 100:15% achieved higher crude protein yields: 100:15%-730.4 kg ha(-1); 100:30%-692.7 kg ha(-1) on average. The costs were not significantly increased with the nitrogen fertilizer, but the net profits were increased by as much as 163%, depending on the nitrogen level and the mixture. Nitrogen fertilizer also achieves higher economic efficiency for the mixture 100:15% compared to the 100:30% mixture. Mixtures of field peas and oats outperform single-grown crops and provide cost-effective feed for a short time. Using optimal seed ratios and nitrogen fertilizer can significantly increase the productivity and profitability of the feed with minimal impact on the overall production costs.",
publisher = "MDPI, Basel",
journal = "Agriculture-Basel",
title = "Biomass and Protein Yields of Field Peas and Oats Intercrop Affected by Sowing Norms and Nitrogen Fertilizer at Two Different Stages of Growth",
number = "9",
volume = "11",
doi = "10.3390/agriculture11090871",
url = "conv_173"
}

Krga, I., Simić, A., Dželetović, Ž., Babić, S., Katanski, S., Roljević Nikolić, S.,& Damnjanović, J.. (2021). Biomass and Protein Yields of Field Peas and Oats Intercrop Affected by Sowing Norms and Nitrogen Fertilizer at Two Different Stages of Growth. in Agriculture-Basel
MDPI, Basel., 11(9).
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11090871
conv_173

Krga I, Simić A, Dželetović Ž, Babić S, Katanski S, Roljević Nikolić S, Damnjanović J. Biomass and Protein Yields of Field Peas and Oats Intercrop Affected by Sowing Norms and Nitrogen Fertilizer at Two Different Stages of Growth. in Agriculture-Basel. 2021;11(9).
doi:10.3390/agriculture11090871
conv_173 .

Krga, Ivan, Simić, Aleksandar, Dželetović, Željko, Babić, Snežana, Katanski, Snežana, Roljević Nikolić, Svetlana, Damnjanović, Jelena, "Biomass and Protein Yields of Field Peas and Oats Intercrop Affected by Sowing Norms and Nitrogen Fertilizer at Two Different Stages of Growth" in Agriculture-Basel, 11, no. 9 (2021),
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11090871 .,
conv_173 .